Showing 2 results for Phacoemulsification
Mohammad Yavari, Jamal Falahati, Mehri Mohamadi,
Volume 10, Issue 2 (6-2007)
Abstract
Introduction: Cataract is one of the most important and a major disease in human. The prevalence of cataract in age 65-74 get to 50%, and over 75 it arrives to 70%. Absolute cure for cataract is surgery that can be done by different techniques such as intracapsular, extracapsular, and phacoemulsification. Cataract surgery has different side effects such as hemorrhage, Glaucoma, posterior capsular opacification and astigmatism. This study decides to compare astigmatism after two techniques of cataract surgery phaco and extracapsular. Materials and Methods: This study is a double blind randomized clinical trial, which has been experienced on 112 patients. Patients were divided in two groups (A and B). In group A surgery was done by phaco technique which has a small incision of 3.2 mm and does not need suture. But in group B, (extracapsular group) the incision is bigger about 10 mm and needs suture. Then keratometry was done for each patient before surgery, one week and 2 months after surgery for determining astigmatism. Data was analyzed by independent and paired sample T tests. p< 0.05 was considered meaningful. Results: From 112 patients that had been studied, 56 patients underwent phaco technique and 56 patients underwent extracapsular technique. Mean of astigmatism before surgery in group phaco was 0.79±0.71 D and in extracapsular was 0.90.55 D (p>0.05). Mean of astigmatism 1 week after surgery in phaco group was 1.110.72 D and in extracapsular group was 3.991.46 D (p<0.05) and mean of astigmatism two months after surgery in phaco group was 1.00.71 D and in extracapsular group was 3.281.29 D (p<0.05). Conclusion: Induced astigmatism in phaco group was 0.21 D and in extracapsular was 2.38 D, that has meningful difference. Other criteria such as age, lens number, sex and left or right eye do not have any effect on induced astigmatism.
Reza Rezaei, Elaheh Ebrahimpoor, Amir Almasi-Hashiani ,
Volume 15, Issue 8 (1-2013)
Abstract
Background: Cataract is the leading cause of blindness and visual impairment. This study was performed to compare effects of two different incision types in cataract surgery on dry eye symptoms and diagnostic test values. Materials and Methods: In this clinical trial, 300 patients with cataract requiring phacoemulsification were studied. The patients were randomly divided into two operative method groups: limbal and clear corneal (anterior to the vascular arcade) incision. A complete set of ophthalmic examinations and tear related tests were done for all of the patients before surgery and one week and one month after surgery. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS and EPI-Info softwares. Results: Overall, 149 men and 151 women were enrolled in this study. On the first postoperative week, the means of symptoms, and TBUT and TMH values in both groups significantly decreased compared with the preoperative values. These values returned to the preoperative levels one month postoperatively which werein contrast to the changes of debri, PEE, corneal and conjnnctival staining. There were statistically significant differences between the results of pre- and post-operative symptoms, PEE, debri, TBUT, conjunctival and corneal staining. Except for TBUT, the results of these tests were not statistically different according to incision location. Conclusion: Phacoemulsification cataract surgery affects dry eye symptoms and diagnostic test values. In addition, except for TBUT, the location of incision had no effect on other test results and symptoms.