---

Introduction: Spinal anesthesia is a conventional way of anesthesia for cesarean section (CS), which nausea and vomiting is a common complication of it. Metoclopramide is the standard medication used for preventing intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV). Because of extrapyromidal side effects of Metoclopramide and known antiemetic effects of low-dose Propofol and Dexamethasone, this study was performed to compare the effectiveness of these drugs for preventing IONV. Materials and Methods: This study, is a randomized clinical trial which is done on 144 parturients who were admitted for emergency CS. Patients were divided randomly into four groups and received: Metoclopramide 0.1 mg/kg IV, Dexamethasone 150 g/kg IV, Propofol 0.1mg/kg every 5 minutes from clamping umbilical cord till the end of operation and the fourth group received 2 ml distilled water. During the operation parturients were monitored for IONV. Data was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and one way ANOVA. Results: The Number of patients having nausea was lowest in Propofol and highest in Dexamethasone group. There was no statistical significant difference between Dexamethasone and placebo groups. The lowest rate of vomiting was in Metoclopramide and Propofol groups and there was no significant difference between them. Also the lowest level of retching was in the Prepofol group. Conclusion: According to results, the antiemetic effects of Propofol and Metoclopramide are similar. Amount of retching in Propofol was slightly lower than Metoclopramide and administration of Propofol was simple, cheap and without serious complications, so we recommend it for emergency CS.

---

Introduction: Type of anesthesia is important in the maternal and fetal well being. There are different informations about effect of general and spinal anesthesia on Apgar score, so in this study a comparision was made on Apgar scores of neonates following these two methods. Materials and Methods: This study is a clinical trial and 168 term pregnant women were selected from elective cesarean candidates and divided in to general and spinal anesthesia groups by randomized allocation method. Then Apgar scores in first, fifth and twentieth minutes were mesured in infants. Also maternal age, cause of cesarean, sex and duration of cesarean section time were all documented. Data was analyzed using T and Chi square tests. Results: Mean Apgar scores were 8.66±0.68, 9.8±0.42 and 9.970.15 at first, fifth and twentieth minutes in general anesthesia group, and 90.38, 9.880.32 and 10 at first and fifth and twentieth minutes in spinal group. The group differed significantly for first minute Apgar score (p<0.001) but there were no significant differences in fifth and twentieth minutes Apgar scores. Conclusion: First minute Apgar score of newborns of mothers under spinal anesthesia was more than those of mothers under general anesthesia but there was no difference between their five minute Apgar score.

---

Background: Postoperative pain brings about undesirable effects such as medical complications, increased healthcare costs, and the need for opioids administration. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of low dose (0.15 mg/kg) ketamine in comparison with the placebo on postoperative pain and analgesics consumption after cesarean section. Materials and Methods: In a randomized clinical trial, 120 women undergoing elective cesarean section were randomly divided into case and control groups. Ketamine (0.15 mgkg-1) or an equal volume of normal saline were administered intravenously immediately after initiating spinal anesthesia to the case and control groups, respectively. The anesthesia and surgery techniques were the same for both groups. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 11. Results: Means of age in the case and control groups were 28.85±4.81 and 28.87 ±5.62 years, respectively. Analgesics consumption, pain scores, homodynamic signs, drowsiness of the mothers, and the neonates’ Apgar scores after cesarean section were similar in both groups and no significant differences were found between them (P>0.05). The mean of postoperative arterial pressure in the early hours in the ketamine group showed a significant decrease compared to the placebo group (P>0.03). The means of the first time of request for analgesics after surgery in the ketamine and placebo groups were 99.75±68.88 and 96.1±52.59 minutes, respectively (P>0.05). Conclusion: It seems that the administration of 0.15 mg/kg dose of ketamine (0.15mg/kg) does not have a significant impact on decreasing the postoperative pain in cesarean section. Therefore, in order to obtain the desirable analgesic effects of this drug, further studies should be conducted with greater doses of this drug and its use in combination with other opioids.

---

Background:Hypotension is one of the common complications of spinal anesthesia. Ephedrine with sympathomimetic effects is the selective vasopressor in obstetric. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of different doses of ephedrine on hypotension due to spinal anesthesia. Materials and Methods: This randomized double-blind clinical trial included 120 parturient patients with ASA Ι and П scheduled for cesarean section under spinal anesthesia at Fatemy Hospital of Hamedan in 2008.The patients were divided into three groups. Immediately after spinal anesthesia, the patients randomly received 10 mg ephedrine, 20 mg ephedrine, or placebo intravenously. Then vital signs were recorded every minute for 5 minutes and after delivery every 10 minutes till the end of the surgery. Results: Incidence of hypotension in 10 mg ephedrine, 20mg ephedrine, and placebo groups was 37.5,12.5, 85%, respectively (P<0.001 ). The difference in the prevalanceof hypotension was significant between the three groups (P<0.05).Based on Chi2 test, the prevalence of hypotension in 20 mg ephedrine group was less than 10 mg ephedrine group, and in the 10mg ephedrine group it was less than the placebo group (P<0.05). Conclusion: Intravenous injection of 10mg and 20mg ephedrine to parturient patients undergoing cesarean section reduces the incidence of hypotension, though thisdecrease is more significant with 20 mg ephedrine.

---

Background: Pain is a complex problem, which can affect patients' physical and psychological condition. Inadequate postoperative pain control has adverse effects on the patients' physiological, metabolic and mental condition. Adding new supplement will increase the duration of analgesia. This study aimed to comparison of intratechal neostigmine and midazolam in increasing the time of postoperative analgesia. Materials and Methods: In this randomized double blind clinical trial, 60 patients with ASA class Ι, II who were candidate for elective colporrhaphy surgery under spinal anesthesia were randomly divided into 3 groups of 20 patients. All patients received hyperbaric lidocaine 5% and groups I received 1 mg midazolam, groups II received 50 μg Neostigmine and groups III received 0.5 cc normal saline additionally. Then according VAS pain score, postoperative painless duration and pain score were compared between groups by running SPSS software. Results: Mean of painless duration in the Midazolam, Neostigmine and control groups were 98.4±18.2, 74.5±32.6 and 64.5±9.9 minutes respectively which was significantly longer than in Midazolam group (p<0.001). The mean dose of requested analgesia in first 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in Midazolam group (p<0.001). Conclusion: Inthrathecal midazolam and Neostigmine as a complementary medication to lidocaine 5% can increase painless duration in colporrhaphy surgery and midazolam is more effective than Neostigmine. Key Words : midazolam & Neostygmine , Spinal anesthesia, painless time , colporrhaphy

---

Background: Caesarean section is one of the most common gynecologic surgeries. Nausea and vomiting after pain is the most common side effect of surgeries, today, we most widely use of serotonin receptor antagonists, that are most effective antiemetic and have less side effect rather than other drug. Ondansetron is typical serotonin antagonists.

Materials and Methods: This is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial on 162 women undergoing cesarean section. 4mg intravenous ondansetron was given to first group and 8mg oral ondansetron was given to second group and thired group recived placebo. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured before and immediately after performing spinal and every 5 minute until 20 minute. Post operative nausea and vomiting and APGAR score were recorded after operation in recovery and 2, 4, and 6 houres after surgery.

Results: There was no significant difference among 3 groups according to age, gravidity, mean atrial pressure and heart rate before and during surgery. Nausea and vomiting in oral and intravenous groups at recovery, 2 and 4 hours after surgery were significantly less nausea and vomiting than placebo group (p<0.05). Whereas there was no significant difference between oral and intravenous groups.

Conclusion: It was concluded that using oral ondansetron with the same antiemetic effect is more convience to women undergoing cesarean section with spinal anesthesia.

---

Background: Spinal anesthesia is an efficient method of providing intra operative analgesia and a safe alternative to general analgesia in many cesarean patients. Despite its advantages, SA is not free from adverse effects, which include unwanted cardiovascular events, in most cases: hypotension and bradycardia. Ondansetron is a 5HT3 receptor antagonist, with known efficacy on preventing nausea and vomiting. Maybe ondansetron given intravenously attenuates the fall of blood pressure and heart rate, by 5HT3 blocking in vagal nerve endings and effect on BJR.(Bezold jarish Reflex).

Materials and Methods: In this clinical trial 102 healthy pregnant women that were candidate for elective cesarean in hamedan fatemieh hospital during 3 months in 1390, studied. They were randomized into 2 groups: the ondansetron group, n= (51) received (4miligram) ondansetron intravenously before performing spinal anesthesia, and placebo group n= (51): received 2cc sterile water before spinal anesthesia. Spinal anesthesia was performed with hyperbaric bupivacaine (0.5%) 10 mg and sufentanil (5 µg) BP and HR were measured and recorded before and after anesthesia immediately. If hypotension happened, ephedrine 5- 10mg injected. Itching and nausea recorded every 10 min during operation by observation and question.

Results: There were no significant differences in SBP, DBP, MAP, HR and itching in both groups. Nausea and vomiting ,and mean consumed ephedrine was siginificantly different in both groups.(p=0.001, p=0.009).

Conclusion: Ondansetron given intravenously with antiemetic dose (4miligram), decreases mean consumed ephedrine and nausea and vomiting after spinal anesthesia, but doesn't have an influence on BP, HP and pruritus