Showing 4 results for Specificity
Mahmood Amini, Tooraj Zandbaf, Shabanali Alizadeh, Yahya Jand, Seid Alireza Hosseini, Babak Eshrati, Ali Cyrus, Hamideh Amini,
Volume 14, Issue 1 (3-2011)
Abstract
Background: Diagnosis of acute appendicitis is one of the challenges that surgeons face in the emergency ward. Although Alvarado score has been recommended in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis, this criterion has some limitations in terms of age, sex, and race. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of Alvarado score in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis based on the age and gender. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional study, 407 patients who underwent operation with the preoperative diagnosis of acute appendicitis from June 2008 to August 2009 were included in the study. The patients’ data were recorded by the investigators. The data were compared by parametric tests. The sensitivity and specificity were determined by the optimal cut-off point on ROC curve using MedCalc software version 10.2.0.0. Results: The optimal cut-off point for women was lower than men (6 and 7, respectively). The rate of negative appendectomy in the group with Alvarado scores 9 and 10 was 11.8%, while the negative appendectomy rate in the other two groups with Alvarado scores 7 and 8 and 5 and 6 were 29.9% and 52.8%, respectively. Conclusion: The diagnostic value of Alvarado score of 8 and less in physical examination is lower than the abdominal tenderness exam alone. Also, the cut-off point for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis in women should be considered lower than that in men. On the other hand, the cut-off point in adolescents and children is higher than adults.
Ali Asghar Farazi, Seyed Davod Hosseini,
Volume 14, Issue 7 (2-2012)
Abstract
Background: Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease in humans and animals that its control is dependent on the prevalence of diseases in animal populations. The purpose of this study was to compare the sensitivity and specificity of common diagnostic tests for brucellosis.
Materials and Methods: In an analytical cross-sectional study, 297 serum samples from an infected herd that had a history of abortion were prepared and evaluated through standard tube agglutination, Rose Bengal, 2-Mercaptoethanol, complement fixation, and ELISA tests. In addition, microbial culture was done for positive serum samples, lymph nodes, and infected organs.
Results: Based on the total 297 serum samples tested, the sensitivities for standard tube agglutination, Rose Bengal, 2-Mercaptoethanol, complement fixation, and ELISA tests were 89, 81.5, 75.3, 89.7, and 93.2% , whereas specificities were determined to be 97.4, 94, 96, 98, and 99.3%, respectively.
Conclusion: The findings of this study show that the standard tube agglutination test, complement fixation test, and ELISA are more sensitive than other tests. Moreover, ELISA test was the most sensitive and specific serological test for diagnosis of brucellosis in the present study
Hadi Peeri Dogaheh, Mohsen Arzanlou, Saeed Hosaini, Neda Habibi,
Volume 15, Issue 5 (10-2012)
Abstract
Background: Brucellosis is one of the most common zoonotic diseases in Iran. In most cases, the diagnosis of brucellosis is difficult not only because of its clinical similarity to many infectious and noninfectious diseases, but also because diagnostic methods often fail to detect organisms. PCR is a rapid and safe diagnostic method applied to the diagnosis of brucellosis. The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of PCR for diagnosis of human brucellosis by using serum samples. Materials and Methods: This study which was done to evaluate diagnostic tests included30 serum samples from patients with clinical presentation of brucellosis with positive Wright test and serum samples of30 healthy people with negative Wright test. These samples were examined by PCR. Results: PCR results were positive for 15 samples of the patients group in comparison with 4 samples from the 30 healthy subjects. The sensitivity and specificity of PCR were 50% and 86.6%, respectively. Conclusion: Although in some studies, the preferred sample for diagnosis of brucellosis was serum, in this study, PCR on serum samples did not indicate high sensitivity and specificity in diagnosis of brucellosis. Hence, using a combination of methods for diagnosis of human brucellosisis suggested.
Morteza Gharibi, Simin Najafgholian, Fatemeh Rafiee, Ali Nazemi, Esmaeil Mansourizadeh,
Volume 22, Issue 5 (11-2019)
Abstract
Background and Aim American College Of Emergency Medicine (ACEM) guideline has a recommendation for early diagnosis of head injuries following mild trauma. In this study we examined the prediction power, sensitivity, and specificity of this clinical guideline in the need for computed tomography (CT) scan
Methods & Materials This cross-sectional study was performed for 6 months on patients over 18 years old referred to the emergency department of Vali-e-Asr Hospital in Arak who met ACEM criteria for head CT scan for suspected mild trauma. Demographic characteristics, clinical symptoms, trauma mechanism, physical injuries caused by head trauma, and history of drug abuse were recorded. The consciousness level (Glasgow Coma Scale) was checked every two hours. Patients underwent treatment if there was a pathology in CT images, and those with no clear pathology were discharged after 6 hours and, followed up by phone for two weeks, and in case of any abnormality in the level of consciousness, they were re-examined by CT scanning.
Ethical Considerations This study has an ethical approval obtained from Arak University of Medical sciences (code: IR.ARAKMU.REC.1396.227).
Results 500 patients, 335 male (67%) and 165 females (33%) with the mean age of 46.39± 2.01 years were studied; the sensitivity the ACEM guideline for predicting the need for CT scan in patients with mild head trauma were 100% with a specificity of 3.46% (for the second recommendation, the sensitivity was 100% with a specificity of 6.7%) which indicated that the test was highly sensitive to diagnosing the patients, but its specificity was low.
Conclusion The ACEM guideline had high sensitivity to predicting the need for CT in patients with mild head trauma, but had very low specificity which makes it an unacceptable criterion for rejecting or performing CT scan in these patients.
