---

Introduction: Electric seizure therapy is one of the most important treatments in psychiatry that is used as the least effective treatment for mental disorders. Significant anesthetics commonly used in Iran for this purpose are sodium thiopental with a dose of 0.5-3.5 mg/kg and propofol with a dose of 2-3 mg/kg, each of which has the above effects. It focuses on different systems of the body and causes different autonomic responses in patients. Therefore, it is necessary to compare the therapeutic effects and side effects of these two drugs in patients undergoing treatment for seizures with electricity. 
method: In this study, which is a cross-sectional clinical trial study, 40 patients in the field of electronics seizure therapy were examined twice, one time with propofol and the next with sodium thiopental to induce anesthesia. Pre-, post-operative, and postoperative information were collected and analyzed by a questionnaire for seizure duration, blood pressure, heart rate, and level of awareness.
Results: The duration of seizures in propofol was less than in thiopental, which was statistically significant (P<0.001). Blood fluid in the case of thiopental increased significantly compared to propofol (P<0.001). The thiopental receptor group also showed a higher increase in heart rate, but this difference was not significant.
Conclusion: The use of propofol in seismic therapy with electricity has fewer side effects than thiopental and its use is recommended.

---

Introduction: Spinal anesthesia is a conventional way of anesthesia for cesarean section (CS), which nausea and vomiting is a common complication of it. Metoclopramide is the standard medication used for preventing intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV). Because of extrapyromidal side effects of Metoclopramide and known antiemetic effects of low-dose Propofol and Dexamethasone, this study was performed to compare the effectiveness of these drugs for preventing IONV. Materials and Methods: This study, is a randomized clinical trial which is done on 144 parturients who were admitted for emergency CS. Patients were divided randomly into four groups and received: Metoclopramide 0.1 mg/kg IV, Dexamethasone 150 g/kg IV, Propofol 0.1mg/kg every 5 minutes from clamping umbilical cord till the end of operation and the fourth group received 2 ml distilled water. During the operation parturients were monitored for IONV. Data was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis and one way ANOVA. Results: The Number of patients having nausea was lowest in Propofol and highest in Dexamethasone group. There was no statistical significant difference between Dexamethasone and placebo groups. The lowest rate of vomiting was in Metoclopramide and Propofol groups and there was no significant difference between them. Also the lowest level of retching was in the Prepofol group. Conclusion: According to results, the antiemetic effects of Propofol and Metoclopramide are similar. Amount of retching in Propofol was slightly lower than Metoclopramide and administration of Propofol was simple, cheap and without serious complications, so we recommend it for emergency CS.

---

Background: Pain following propofol injection was reported between 28- 90 %. Ketamine have lesser cardiovascular depression effect and also local anesthetic effect. In this study effect of ketamin were analyzed when it given before propofol injection. Methods and Materials: In a randomized double blind clinical trial selected 120 ASA I, II Ptients with 15-65 years old. They were candidated for elective surgery, in half of the patients 100 µg/kg ketamine in 2 ml volume and in another half, 2 ml distilled water were given before propofol injection. Severity of injection pain was evaluated according to 4 scale criteria (none, mild, moderate, or severe) fifteen seconds after injection of 25% of the calculated dose of propofol. Heart rate (HR) and noninvasive blood pressure were recorded before and after propofol injection, immediately and 3 minutes after intubation. The data were analysed by Mann Whitney U, Pooled t-Test and the Chi-squared test. Results: Pain was not sensed in 51.56% and 75% of control and case groups respectively. In cases group showed little decrease in systolic and diastolic pressures after anesthetic induction (p=0.012 and p=0.005). There were upper diastolic pressures after intubation (p=0.00) and 3 minutes after intubation (p=0.000). During intervention heart rate changes had not significant difference between two groups. Conclusion: Ketamine pre-treatment was an effective method in reducing pain and providing hemodynamic stability after propofol induction.

---

Background: Preoperative anxiety is a common reaction in patients. Many techniques are used for alleviation of it, such as preoperative visit by the anesthetist, reassurance by a psychologist, and prescription of tranquilizer drugs. In this study we surveyed propofol compared to Midazolam on pre-operative anxiolysis. Methods and Materials: In randomized controlled double-blind clinical trial, 60 patient swith ASA class I candidates for elective abdominal operations were randomly allocated in 3 equal groups (propofol, midazolam and normal salin). Anxiety was measured with 2 different scales: visual analogue scale (VSA) and clinical global impression (CGI). Pulse rate (PR), blood pressure (BP), respiratory rate (RR), and saturation PO2 (SPO2) were measured before drug administration and 3 times after that in 2.5 min intervals. Results were analyzed with ANNOVA, repeated measures ANNOVA, TUKEY, and X2 tests. Results: There were no differences in demographic variables between groups. Both propofol and midazolam were more effective than placebo in anxiety reduction. Both drugs had equal effect (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in BP, PR, RR and SPO2 between two drugs. Conclusion: Both drugs were the same and more effective than placebo. Midazolam may be preferred for economical reasons.

---

Background: One of the most important complications of tonsillectomy is laryngospasm which leads to airway obstruction, arterial hypoxemia, and hypercarbia. Thus the present study was carried out to compare the effect of propofol with sodium thiopental, as an induction agent of anesthesia, on the incidence and intensity of laryngospasm after extubation in tonsillectomy. Materials and Methods: This double-blind clinical trial was done on 60 3-12-year-old patients who were chosen for elective tonsillectomy at Qods Hospital in Qazvin. The patients were randomly divided into two equal groups. Method of anesthesia was the same in these two groups except for the induction of anesthesia one group received sodium thiopental and the other group received propofol. At the end of the operation, patients were extubated after the restoration of spontaneous respiration with adequate tidal volume and respiratory rate. Then the incidence and intensity of laryngospasm was evaluated. Data were analyzed by t-test, Chi-square, and Fisher's exact test using SPSS software. Results: Overall, 83% of the patients in the sodium thiopental group and 93% of the patients in the propofol group did not develop laryngospasm and there were no statistical differences between the two groups in terms of the incidence and intensity of laryngospasm after extubation in tonsillectomy (P=0.535). Conclusion: As an induction agent in general anesthesia, propofol has the same effect as sodium thiopental on the incidence and intensity of laryngospasm after tonsillectomy.

---

Background: Pain is a complex medical problem creating which inadequate control pain results adverse effects on the patients physiological, metabolic and mental conditions.The aim of this study was comparison effect of Ketamin-propofol with Alfentanil-propofol on creating analgesia and sedation during cystoscopy and comparing the side effects of two drugs and patient and physician satissfaction.

Materials and Methods: In this double- blind clinical trial 140 person who were candidate for cystoscopy were randomly divided into two groups The first group received 1mcg/kg alfentanil with 1mg/kg propofol and the second group received 0.5 mg/kg ketamin with 1mg/kg propofol. Sedation score ,pain score, time of cystoscopy and hemodynamic changes determined and data were analyzed by SPSS.

Results: The mean of sedation in alfetanil group was significantly more than ketamin group(p=0.001) . The mean of pain score in alfetanil group was significantly less than ketamin group( p=0.001) .The time of cystoscopy in cystoscopy in alfetanil group was significantly less than ketamin group (p=0.001).

Conclusion: Results showed that alfentanil-propofol compare to ketamin-propofol reduced pain score and increased time of sedation with less side effects during cystoscopy .So this study supports the preference alfentanil compare to ketamin.

---