---

Introduction: Using one subcutaneous infiltration of Bopivacaine can cause a good pain relief in pediatric surgery, so the child may no longer need rectal Acetaminophen after surgery. In this study, we compared the efficacy of the two drugs. Materials and Methods: This was a clinical trial, performed on 141 pediatric patients between 6 months to 3 years old with unilateral or bilateral inguinal hernia or undescending testis. Patients were divided randomly into two groups. The first group received infiltration of Bopivacaine preoperatively and the second received the routine rectal Acetaminophen after surgery. In both groups pain score was measured with FPRS score 3,6,12 and 24 hours after surgery. After collecting data they were analyzed with T-student and Friedman tests. P<0/05 was considered significant. Results: Global FPRS pain score was lower in the group treated with Bupivacaine infiltration on 3 and 6 hours after surgery (p<0/05), but in 12 and 24 hours after surgery no significant difference was seen in the two groups. Conclusion: This study showed that, infiltration of Bupivacaine reduces pain better than Acetaminophen, especially during the first 6 hours after surgery. So because of better pain control and also single administration, we suggest using infiltralition of Bupivacaine preoperatively.

---

Background: Systemic and hemodynamic complications associated with stereotactic and Mayfield pin insertion pain and is one of the major problems in neuro-anesthesiology. The aim of this study was to decrease patients' hypertensive response to pain and stressful condition of the disease which may bring about problems during operation. Materials and Methods: In a randomized, double-blind clinical trial, thirty 16-65 year old ASA I and II patients at Al-Zahra Hospital of Isfahan were analyzed between September 2008 and November 2009. The level of pain according to VAS of pain was obtained from the patients in three stages: After pin insertion (stage 1), while returning from MRI (stage 2), and at the end of the procedure (stage 3) and recorded in the questionnaire. Data were analyzed through SPSS software. Results: The mean VAS of pin insertion pain for lidocaine in the three stages was 5.46, 5.00, and 2.46 and for bupivacaine was 5.76, 3.76 and 1.40, respectively (P<0.005). This indicated a significant difference between lidocaine and bupivacaine. Conclusion: As stereotactic operations take 3 to 3.5 hours on average, the use of bupivacaine instead of lidocaine is highly recommend during pin insertion.

---

Background: Hysterectomy is one of the most common surgical procedures. Only after cesarian section, hysterectomys considered as second major surgical procedure. Problems such as severe pelvic pain, irregular or heavy bleeding and uterine cancer are cases that hysterectomy is used to care them. Abdominal pain after abdominal hysterectomy is one of the most common complaints of patients undergoing this type of surgery. This study aimed to compare the effects of bupivacaine into the subcutaneous tissue and skin ketamine to control pain after surgery in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy under general anesthesia.

Materials and Methods: This study is a randomized, double-blind clinical trial involving 99 women candidating for TAH referred to Taleghani center in Arak who were divided into three groups. The average duration of analgesia and pain and pain score were recorded.

Results: The average duration of analgesia in ketamine group, in the bupivacaine group and in the placebo group was 65.1±8.8, 65.4±8.7, and 57.6±5.5, respectively. According to p≤0.01, there was a significant difference between the three groups. The duration of analgesia in the placebo group was significantly lower than ketamine and bupivacaine groups, while that between ketamine and bupivacaine in terms of the average duration of analgesia, no significant difference was observed.

Conclusion: The results of our study indicate that the use of bupivacaine and cutaneous ketamine is effective in reducing postoperative pain in patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy and further doses of ketamine and bupivacaine single dose resulted in a significant reduction of postoperative pain in patients compared to the placebo group.

---

Introduction: Some intracranial surgeries must be performed while the patient is awake. Awake craniotomy is an intracranial surgical procedure in which the patient remains in a state of controlled consciousness while the surgery is performed. The aim of this study was to present a case of intracranial surgery to remove a tumor in the right frontal cortex using awake craniotomy.
Case Report: This report describes the anesthetic management of a 22-year-old male undergoing craniotomy with a fully awake technique. This was the first case of craniotomy performed entirely awake (from the beginning to the end of the operation) at Arak University of Medical Sciences and Valiasr Hospital in Arak, After preoperative preparation and evaluation, scalp nerve blocks targeting the cranial nerves innervating the scalp and head muscles were administered at specific sites. Mild sedation was provided using oxygen supplementation, followed by surgical incision. The lesion was examined intraoperatively while the patient remained awake, and the tumor was safely excised under full wakefulness. A combination of local and regional anesthesia and light intravenous sedation was utilized. Two types of local anesthetics, lidocaine 1.5% and bupivacaine 2.5%, were used for anesthesia, as well as intravenous sedatives and anesthetics such as propofol, remifentanil, and dexmedetomidine were administered for sedation. Throughout the operation, the patient was awake and breathing spontaneously, and the function of the brain nerves during the operation could be evaluated. Finally, the patient's surgery was performed without any complications and in stable condition, and the patient was transferred to the intensive care unit in good general condition, awake and fully alert.
Conclusions: Although maintaining analgesia and hemodynamic and adequate ventilation during fully awake craniotomy poses challenges, this technique is critical for intraoperative monitoring of cranial nerve function and preventing neurological deficits. By precisely administering scalp nerve blocks and carefully titrating sedatives (propofol, remifentanil, dexmedetomidine), we successfully performed the procedure under full wakefulness. With this method, potential surgical complications are prevented, and the patient also experiences satisfactory painlessness. Applying this technique was satisfactory for our patient.